
Comics wear you down. Especially when you're doing the thing as I try to do it, staying out on the edge of all the new developments and shocking challenges the medium plays host to, it's all too easy to get tired. Rawdog experimental art-on-the-page, mixed-media reinterpretations of cartooning, xerox-machine noise on printer paper... oh man, I love those things, but oh man, don't show me any of those things. I get like this from time to time. I think when we start we probably all come to comics as a place of rest and relaxation, something that can entertain us and create a little pleasance in our lives for a second. Most readers treat every single one of their interactions with the medium that way. I think that's largely because most readers are reading superhero comics, which (at best) are designed to deliver exactly what I'm talking about, hits of escape and fantasy that leave you feeling good. Such an interaction with comics is exactly what I was looking for last time I picked one out -- something I didn't have to work at, something perhaps with the tinge of nostalgia to it. For me, then, it had to be a superhero comic. It couldn't have been anything else.
When you come up reading these things you never go away entirely or for good. The fishhook of familiarity that shared universes and recognizable character dynamics places in you never comes loose completely. Even when, like me, you haven't read a modern superhero comic in the better part of a calendar year. They'll always be the comfort food, the link back to a time when comics was something new, something you hadn't figured out yet, something you didn't even realize had aspects that could be "figured out". But I think I'm part of the very last generation for whom that warm, friendly, rose-colored attachment to superhero comics exists. It's a feeling that's driven the mainstream-comics market for years, the soft blanket of buying habits, the sense of commitment and welcomeness. These days, it's the only thing keeping the things read at all. There is a blindness that comes with superhero fandom -- I've got, every comics reader I know has it -- it's the one that keeps people from realizing just how bad the stuff on the shelves these days is, that we are being served by a generation of writers that's very probably the worst of all time, and a crop of artists that's the product of the friendly comic book making companies finally getting on this whole "labor outsourcing" thing that killed all the automobile-manufacture jobs in my family.

Basically, superheroes are no longer an industry that's interested in creating new readers. You knew that? Yeah, everybody knows that. But more importantly, they're no longer placing any premium at all on creating that sense of welcome, either, the approachability in both content and method of delivery that used to make the Marvel Universe seem like something appealing for kids to get into. It's just gone. This is no longer a market that even attempts to create new participants. But you know what? They aren't gone from comics. Kids are still wild about comics, people. I'm back on the retail train and I have seen them scream for Amulet and crawl across floors on their hands and knees for Yo Gabba Gabba and Bone. When the ones who stick around go looking for something pleasant and nostalgic in a decade or two, it won't be anything with a Marvel or DC logo, it'll be the new bookstore-ready crop of well-drawn, well-considered, positive-message graphic novels. Can superheroes survive this? My money's on "no".
So yeah... I might be archaic in my clinging to spandexed demigods for warm, unchallenging comics reading, but that's what it is. The comic I chose was the recent hardcover collection of Thor Godstorm. It's an interesting book to pick off the shelves. The Alex Ross-style painted cover image is backed by a blurb exclaiming "A new enemy is empowered to battle Thor, but which old enemy is behind it all? Plus: the ominous Uroc, terror of Trolls! Guest-starring the Avengers and the Warriors Three!" Beneath the blurb is the back-cover image, a painting of Thor fighting Loki. Which old enemy, indeed. Just look at the diction of those sentences though, just think about their utter impenetrability. They speak a secret language. This is supposed to be the book's marketing, the place for it to extol its own virtues, and it boasts of nods to concepts that only those who've read a lot of things like this before will even know, let alone be caught by. It's a language that I understand, but it isn't my language per se. If this book spoke that tongue it wouldn't even have a cover image, just bold capitals spelling out THOR STEVE RUDE MIKE MIGNOLA, because those are the dudes whose artwork is in the book, and that's what sold me.

Mostly it's Steve Rude, who draws the main "Godstorm" story, in which a sentient raincloud battles Thor over three different eras. (This isn't just nostalgia comics because it's superheroes, it's one of the kinds that's actually calculated to remind readers of how sweet and innocent the stuff was back when they were kids in 1965. (My father was three years old.) As written by Kurt Busiek, it's perfect pap, the best dopey hero comic you could wish for. I wish for those a lot.) Rude is an interesting artist, with an interesting career to go with. He quit comics a while ago to focus on painting commissions. Now he's ostensibly "back", though nothing's actually been published with new work by him lately. I'm always excited to see work by Rude, because his artwork is perfectly pitched toward creating the kind of pleasant, uncomplicated and nostalgia-driven reading experience I associate with superhero comics.
Rude's work is rooted deeply in Jack Kirby, whose particular stylisms and affectations are themselves a kind of secret language for superhero comics, the codes with which stories about physical conflicts between costumed musclemen most successfully compose themselves. Pretty much every American hero comic published in the past 40 years has a basis in Kirby, but there's a basis and then there's what Rude does, which is more along the lines of reanimation. Kirby's pacing, his compositions and gestures, the way he blocked out scenes and used facial expressions to imply character -- it's all here, done with an instinctive understanding that goes past copyism. This is just how you make good hero comics, and if it ends up a derivative product that's okay, because believe it or not this is a medium that other artists have worked in before. But for all the applied knowledge brought to bear on its pages, Thor Godstorm doesn't look exactly like a Kirby comic. Rude's understanding of the Kirby style is a rather archaic one to my eyes: he isolates the nuts-and-bolts storytelling, the stylistic consistency, the clean lines and crisp solid blacks -- not the crackling power of pure images that's become the most recognizable aspect of Kirby's legacy in the wake of the new-millenium art-comix that bear his influence.

For Rude, Kirby seems to be the link to a golden past, a time when cartooning was a craft and comics was a job and even the most mercilessly professional hack could grind out a page that read perfectly. All the rough edges of Kirby, the weird bits that have become so fetishized over the past decade or so, are sanded down in Rude, replaced with something slicker and quieter and more homogenous. A distillation of Toth, Infantino, Sekowsky, Anderson, Hal Foster, even Norman Rockwell. A serene, understated figurative realism that makes the Kirby world seem a plausible one, a place where real human beings could really live. It's nostalgia as high art, the psychological image of better times past that Kirby calls up in superhero comics fans combined with a greater approachability and calm, a familiar type of comics crossbred with art that actually looks familiar, that creates pretty human figures and unthreatening environments with a few beautiful, fluid lines.
These things make Rude's work look pretty unique today, but there was a time when he was only a part of something bigger. It was probably a misfortune that Rude had his years as an exciting and hungry young genre cartoonist during the one window in time that such talent didn't end up doing long runs on bestselling superhero comics. In the 1960s and '70s, Marvel and DC were simply the only place to go, the single way to make a career of note drawing action comics. And once the artists who would go on to found Image Comics started tearing things up at the big houses in the late '80s, that became the thing to do once more. But there was a decade or so when publishing your own creator-owned mythological opus or space opera or superspy saga with a smaller house was simply how it worked, the way you were going to get rich and innovate exciting new ways of doing comics in the bargain. (Rude and writer Mike Baron opted for space opera in his gorgeous, unreadable series Nexus.) A whole wave of artists -- call them the "neoclassical" school -- participated in this era, guys who took the influence of Silver Age superhero drawing combined with a historical perspective on Pop art as fertile enough ground to spring whole universes of their own from. Rude, Paul Chadwick, Dave Stevens, Mike Allred -- all of them "did the Kirby" and created their own supernaturally powered characters, their own sublimely transportative story worlds.

All of them, Rude most of all, have been either lost to history or overlooked by it, the books that carry the greatest weight of their energy and innovation either out of print for years (Stevens and Allred, though that's been changing), ignored (Chadwick), or simply unavailable to any but the most diehard fanatics, scarce in the back issue bins and only reprinted in obscenely overpriced hardcover archive editions. Rude did plenty of work for the superhero publishers once the promise of creator ownership turned up an empty one, but there's always something lacking about it. In Thor Godstorm it's the totality of the retreat into Kirbyism, the willingness to subsume the individual Rude style -- busier compositions, subtler action blocking, a greater emphasis on bold graphic design -- into the anonymized general look of "classic Marvel". Corporate is as corporate does, and while one gets the sense that Rude was passionate about doing "Kirby comics", there's also the feeling that this was only a job for a man who managed the herculean feat of bringing out 100 issues of his own independent action comic.
But the real sad thing is that comics like Godstorm are the only Rude books you can actually read. Nexus, for all its great beauty and innovative cartooning, is a belabored mess, the jargon-y gobbledygook of superhero books cut loose from the idea of a youth audience. Rude's Silver Age-inflected "comics for grownups" are simply more complicated, more intricate, more self-referential. As written by Busiek here, they couldn't even exist without decades-old ideas to power them. Those busy compositions that differentiate him from Kirby are less striking, less immediate, more of a labor to get through when they pop up in Godstorm. The familiarity of a concept like dumb ol' Thor is all that makes a comic done in the Rude style comprehensible. The Silver Age ended a long time ago, and if the attempts to revive it, or even to scry something more workable than square fingers and foreshortened limbs from it had been successful then the name Steve Rude would be a lot more than a footnote. But like I said, comics wear you down.

14 comments:
"Nexus, for all its great beauty and innovative cartooning, is a belabored mess"
How about elaborating on all of those points: its beauty, innovative cartooning, as well as why it's belabored and a mess?
Nexus is a mess because the layouts are completely impossible to read unless you are versed in late 70s Steranko, Colan and Starlin layouts that Rude studied and then morphed into impossible to read 80s layouts. Trust me. Track down the letter Toth sent to Rude about layouts on his Johnny Quest story. Rude can ape Kirby layouts but when he does his own thing it's pretty tough to decode.
Wonderful read, as always, but I also want to chime in and rebut the "Nexus is unreadable" slur. (Fess up, you put that in just to encourage comments, din'cha? Someone's been reading Tom Brevoort tweets!)
I followed the book from its color debut, and I found it moody, mysterious, fantastic, sexy, compelling and… readable. Messy and/or muddy at times, especially in the later years, but I thought it strongly written. Despite the deliberate vagueness shielding some of the mysteries yet to unfold, the plots, politics and homages were clear, the characters were SO fresh and modern (new wave, actually) for the time, and the characters aged, changed, grew and died (Oh Kreed, you noble sumbitch) more authentically than their mainstream contemporaries.
Say what you will about the later period but the first 50 issues or so held up to my re-reading them a few years ago. You want to cite unreadable comics, feel free to extemporate (did I make up a new word there?) on Titans or 90's X-men, but casting such a broad generality over a fine series like Nexus is, respectfully, just plain uninformed.
"A new enemy is empowered to battle Thor, but which old enemy is behind it all? Plus: the ominous Uroc, terror of Trolls! Guest-starring the Avengers and the Warriors Three!"
I really don't see what kind of 'secret language' this blurb is speaking. It seems pretty dumbed down to me. I don't know a single 3rd grader who wouldn't understand "Hey, this guy Thor is a superhero and he's gonna fight a new bad guy, and also an old bad guy. Plus some other stuff." What's impenetrable is "THOR RUDE MIGNOLA" because no one beyond a small section of comic fandom knows who they are.
"Basically, superheroes are no longer an industry that's interested in creating new readers."
This is another thing I don't get, what with your negativity towards the DC relaunch. What is the relaunch if not an attempt to pick up some new readers? I mean do you really think they're expecting all those lapsed "I, Vampire" and "Resurrection Man" readers to come back and start buying comics again? These are concepts that never sold in the first place, or in "Frankenstein: Agent of Shade"'s case, stuff they've never really tried before beyond an obscure miniseries. They're trying to diversify their characters, trying to stop writing for the trade, trying to branch out into other genres a bit, trying to find a more acceptable price-point, trying not to get too caught up in continuity and admitting that their comics need to get better. I think those are all steps in the right direction.
I can't relate to the Nexus observation at all. I thought his "World's Finest" story was impenetrable, but not Nexus.
First of all, I admire DttU and the high level of discourse you maintain about the craft & art of comics. I was saddened to read this piece, though - you really damn Rude with faint praise here.
I don't disagree with all your points (although I can't recall getting lost while reading Rude's work). But I think that an artist of his caliber (and an unusual piece of comics history like Nexus) deserves more thoughtful attention than what you're giving here.
It seems that your lack of interest in the whole superhero thing is affecting your perspective. Maybe you were trying to be cute, but to refer to "a concept like dumb ol' Thor" - Come on, the concept of Thor is one of a Norse god. I imagine you've seen what a writer like Eddie Campbell can do with the godly characters of the Greek pantheon in Deadface, The Eyeball Kid, etc. So don't denigrate the concept itself, eh?
Finally: keep up the good work.
Gotta join the pro-Nexus crowd here. It was one of a few comics in the 90s I made sure to buy each month and was easily the best ongoing series in its time. The fact that Dark Horse dropped it was always confusing/painful to me. Very stupid.
The funny thing with the Toth criticism--while there's some truth to it--is that so much of Toth's work gives you a headache to look at because too often he only varies angles slightly, instead of creating a flow of images. It's like Frazetta comics: individual panels are beautiful, but they don't flow together. Rude's stuff has always flowed to me. The real reason he's not more popular is because he's not as flashy as Image-sytle artists and because there's no irony or sarcasm in his work, which is what you get with a lot of indie guys.
This is bullshit. There's nothing wrong with loving today's superhero comics. Don't confuse your nostalgic backwash with some kind of superior storytelling to today's excellent stable of creators.
thanks to everyone who signed a name to their comments
I started getting into comics (starting mainly with superheroes before branching out some) when I was 14, 15 or so, but the thing is I was already an anime and sci-fi shows nerd. In fact, I think the fact that someone like me, who totally loves superheroes and has since I was a kid, couldn't find a way to get into comics until I was already a teenager, actually shows how difficult it is for new people to get into super-comics.
There's one thing I have to disagree with you on, which is that nostalgia for superhero comics is going to fade as less kids are raised on them. You're forgetting the cartoons and movies, which are what reach the widest audiences today. I grew up on the Batman and Superman animated series without knowing anything about how to get comic books, and so superheroes are still part of my childhood, even though comics aren't.
That said, the Big Two aren't going to get a lot of new readers from that crowd, the kids who watched the shows in the 90s or the kids going to see Iron Man and watching Batman: The Brave and the Bold, because those are things most people grow out of. The kids who remember that stuff and discover comics as a result are mostly nerd kids like me, who never stopped watching cartoons, moving on to anime and stuff. That's not exactly most kids. To get millions of readers again they'd need to start selling to kids again, and even if they're "trying" with things like the DC relaunch or Marvel Adventures, the direct market is still a nearly impenetrable barrier to most prospective fans.
So I think what I was trying to say is that superhero comics can probably survive for at least a while longer in their present state, it'll just still be a tiny, insular niche thing. And it's not really because of all the shit artists, I think it's mainly the direct market, the system outside the comic itself. You could have goddamn Shakespeare write a comic with art by Michaelangelo, and put Wolverine in it, and it still won't sell more than 150,000 copies, tops.
I don't think hardly any of the kids absorbing superhero tv/movies/games make the jump to the comics. By which I mean, I haven't seen them do it basically at all. These days kids' experience of the comics medium is Bone, Amulet, Babysitters Club. Superheroes are those things on tv.
The reprimands that Toth gave Rude in that letter are ridiculous and incredibly mean-spirited, and only attest to his reputation as a very difficult man and a 'guiding figure' bent on crushing the possibility of idiosyncratic storytelling.
Toth was a master, but one that understood and recongnized as legit only a very specific set of rules - and nothing else apparently, i.e. what he criticizes and despises is basically what makes Rude's work unique and not just merely a riff on Toth's or Kirby's style.
That said, I must say that I do think Rude jams his pages with unusual details and stuff that often distracts the reader from the core actions of the plot (not to mention his weird sense of faux-classicism). And that is actually the beauty of it, it is immersive, solid; familiar and strange at once.
I understand that some people might not like it.
But I love it.
Oh man I loved Godstorm! Interesting to see Rude (of whom I am a massive, massive fan) update his "Kirby-ist" approach from that old Mister Miracle one-off he did--mainly by taking it back to a more rigid four-panel grid...I never thought I'd see Frank Santoro write "Nexus is a mess"...that's bullshit! Re-read those first fifty issues (well, all the ones Steve Rude drew anyway...) g'wan you know you want to!
I have only read one issue of Steve Rude comics, unfortunately. It was a black and white issue of Nexus from like Dark Horse or somebody. It was visually dense, for sure but I enjoyed it. It was Sunday Afternoon Comix.
I don't know about you, but Sunday afternoon, sitting in a coffeehouse by the window, in the rain is the best time, place and situation to slowly absorb some beastly dense comic books. Weekdays are no good: too much hustle and bustle. Fridays are too relaxed; a time of complete decompression and unwinding. Saturdays are filled with the promise of adventure and treasures. No, it has to be Sunday. When the body has already had a day free to run wild and the mind is subtly building the resolve and willpower to rejoin the workforce and straight society. Sit by the window and unlock that treasure.
That said, the point in your essay that resonated with me most of all was the distinction between today's artist-cartoonists and yesteryear's workman-cartoonists. No mistake: the workmen loved drawing and designing innovative solutions to storytelling problems as much as our contemptory artists do. For that matter, yesteryear's scribes loved spinning a good tale as much as today's do. The difference is that back then, they weren't a bunch of FANS.
The fan-turned-pro phenomenon makes comics unlike any other pop art or entertainment field. Comics are extremely reflexively nostalgia-fed because by the 1980s, there wasn't anybody involved in the field who wasn't there for reasons other than being the next to bat on a preconceived concept.
Know what I mean?
Anyway, I try my best to take these comic books at face value and I try not to lament too hard about what might have been if the writers and artists had continued to move forward, rather than drawing mediocre Thor comics.
And heck, I like a good spin on an old franchise just as much as you do. Signed, PART OF THE PROBLEM.
Post a Comment